Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



i disagree. Consider the following example from LTT:
...
         trace_socket_sendmsg(sock, sock->sk->sk_family,
                 sock->sk->sk_type,
                 sock->sk->sk_protocol,
                 size);
...

what do the 5 extra lines introduced by trace_socket_sendmsg() tell us? Nothing. They mostly just duplicate the information i already have from the function declaration. They obscure the clear view of the function:
 ...
the resulting visual and structural redundancy hurts.

Couldn't that be easily fixed by just doing

	trace_socket_sendmsg(sock, size);

and have it work out which esoteric parts of the sock we want to trace,
and which we don't? Is much less visually invasive, and gives the same
effect.

M.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux