> the question is: what is more maintainance, hundreds of static
> tracepoints (with long parameter lists) all around the (core) kernel, or
> hundreds of detached dynamic rules that need an update every now and
> then? [but of which most would still be usable even if some of them
> "broke"] To me the answer is clear: having hundreds of tracepoints
> _within_ the source code is higher cost. But please prove me wrong :-)
Actually I rarely find that any of the 70 000 printk is such a huge
nuisance to code readability. They may even help understand what is
going on in a code area you are less familiar with.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
