Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> wrote:

> Following an advice Christoph gave me this summer, submitting a 
> smaller, easier to review patch should make everybody happier. Here is 
> a stripped down version of LTTng : I removed everything that would 
> make the code review reluctant (especially kernel instrumentation and 
> kernel state dump module). I plan to release this "core" version every 
> few LTTng releases and post it to LKML.
> 
> Comments and reviews are very welcome.

i have one very fundamental question: why should we do this 
source-intrusive method of adding tracepoints instead of the dynamic, 
unintrusive (and thus zero-overhead) KProbes+SystemTap method?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux