>>>> + for (; nr < (ARRAY_SIZE(proc_base_stuff) - 1); filp->f_pos++, nr++) {
>>>
>> Also works without the () around ARRAY_SIZE(..)-1
>
>Sure. But I don't really trust C precedence (because it is wrong)
Wrong? In mathematics, "a < (b - 1)" also is equivalent to "a < b - 1".
>and having to remember where it is wrong sucks. Plus in this
>case I really am making it clear that ARRAY_SIZE(..)-1 is the concept
>I want. If there would any more to the expression that would
>be important.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
