Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> writes:
>>> +static struct pid_entry proc_base_stuff[] = {
>>> + NOD(PROC_TGID_INO, "self", S_IFLNK|S_IRWXUGO,
>>> + &proc_self_inode_operations, NULL, {}),
>>> + {}
>>> +};
>>
>>We could save a bunch of bytes here.
>>
>>> + /* Lookup the directory entry */
>>> + for (p = proc_base_stuff; p->name; p++) {
>>
>>By using ARRAY_SIZE here.
>>
>>> + for (; nr < (ARRAY_SIZE(proc_base_stuff) - 1); filp->f_pos++, nr++) {
>>
>>like that does.
>
> Also works without the () around ARRAY_SIZE(..)-1
Sure. But I don't really trust C precedence (because it is wrong)
and having to remember where it is wrong sucks. Plus in this
case I really am making it clear that ARRAY_SIZE(..)-1 is the concept
I want. If there would any more to the expression that would
be important.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]