Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote:

> > The problem being that it doesn't _exclusively_ address scaling issues, some
> > new features may well be interesting to non high end users as well. If it's
> > supposed to be a high end only fs, then please don't call ext4, otherwise it
> > would mislead users about what it doesn't is - a general purpose fs.
> It will work just fine on 32-bit machines.
> You're making a mountain out of a molehill.

I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing, my initial concern was 
this comment from Andrew: "I'd have thought that we'd just make ext4
depend on 64-bit sector_t and be done with it." This would require LBD and 
I don't think this is "just fine" on 32bit machines.

bye, Roman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux