Hi, On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > The problem being that it doesn't _exclusively_ address scaling issues, some > > new features may well be interesting to non high end users as well. If it's > > supposed to be a high end only fs, then please don't call ext4, otherwise it > > would mislead users about what it doesn't is - a general purpose fs. > > It will work just fine on 32-bit machines. > > You're making a mountain out of a molehill. I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing, my initial concern was this comment from Andrew: "I'd have thought that we'd just make ext4 depend on 64-bit sector_t and be done with it." This would require LBD and I don't think this is "just fine" on 32bit machines. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] Simple Slab: A slab allocator with minimal meta information
- Next by Date: [PATCH 9/14] Generic ioremap_page_range: mips conversion
- Previous by thread: Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Index(es):