Hi, On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Or you could just not bother, and leave everything as u64. > > > > Why? > > To eliminate needless complexity and keep things simple and obvious? Considering the amount of complexity we add for the high end, why is it suddenly a bad thing to add even a _little_ complexity for the other end? bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- References:
- [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Index(es):
 |