Roman Zippel wrote:
If you force everyone to use 64bit sector numbers, I don't understand how you can claim "still working just fine on 32bit"?
64bit sector numbers work just fine on 32-bit machines.
At some point ext4 is probably going to be the de facto standard, which very many people want to use, because it has all the new features, which won't be ported to ext2/3. So I still don't understand, what's so wrong about a little tuning in both directions?
Just seems like wasted effort to me. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- References:
- [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Mingming Cao <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Prev by Date: Re: Merging libata PATA support into the base kernel
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/9] sector_t format string
- Index(es):