Hans Reiser wrote:
Pavel Machek wrote:Yes, I'm afraid redundancy/checksums kill write speed,they kill write speed to cache, but not to disk.... our compression plugin is faster than the uncompressed plugin.....
Regarding cache, do we do any sort of consistency checking for RAM, or do we leave that to some of the stranger kernel patches -- or just an occasional memtest?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: David Masover <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
- Next by Date: Re: [Alsa-user] another in kernel alsa update that breaks backward compatibilty?
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):
 |