Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Horst H. von Brand wrote:
Bernd Schubert <[email protected]> wrote:

While filesystem speed is nice, it also would be great if reiser4.x would be very robust against any kind of hardware failures.

Can't have both.

Why not? I mean, other than TANSTAAFL, is there a technical reason for them being mutually exclusive? I suspect it's more "we haven't found a way yet..."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux