Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime

BTW, there may be another atime mode to consider, which I believe is what
Windows XP does w/ NTFS: only update the atime if it's newer than the
on-disk file's atime by N seconds (defaults to one hour, but I believe it's
configurable).  There could be scenarios in which this mode is preferable.

Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
    • From: Valerie Henson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
• Next by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Relative lazy atime
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]