Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch

Hi,

Jean Delvare <[email protected]> writes:

> In practice, I would guess that both X and the framebuffer drivers only
> use the I2C/DDC channel to read the monitor's EDID at initialization
> time, so the risk of concurrent accesses is thin.

Yes. It's a bit different when I log console messages to the EEPROM
(connected to VGA DDC pins), but still... I don't have X on this
machine :-)

Looks like this very small project gets bigger.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
  - From: Jean Delvare <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
Next by Date: Re: Generic battery interface
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]