Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Eventually, I'm the one who's going to maintain the code, most
>> of the drivers in the video directory are practically abandoned. 
> 
> BTW, it's fortunate that you are maintaing it. The I2C code in cirrusfb
> uses vga_wseq() and vga_rseq(). Is it safe WRT races between I2C
> adapter code and fb code? I don't see any locking here, and both
> functions are non-atomic (write merging and posting will not break it,
> but it looks like I need a lock for concurent access).

Correcting myself: vga_wseq() is not a problem in little endian machines
because the 2 single-byte writes are done with a single 2-byte write.
vga_rseq() is not safe though.

I don't know how big a problem this is, reading the i2c bus while the
video mode is changing..., but I agree that it might be worthwhile
to at least lock sequencer access.

Tony




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux