Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch

"Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]> writes:

> There are better reasons (ie, smaller patch), but worse readability is not
> one of them.
>
> I could more easily grasp the code flow of cirrusfb_register() if you
> just inserted "cirrusfb_create_i2c_buses()" instead of:

Feel free to add another patch, while I don't see a need I have nothing
against :-)
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
    • From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
    • From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
    • From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
    • From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
    • From: "Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc1: slab BUG_ON(!PageSlab(page)) upon umount after failed suspend
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Airprime driver improvements to allow full speed EvDO transfers
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] cirrus-logic-framebuffer-i2c-support.patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]