Re: suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]

On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:42:25PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> So we have 1 submission for review in 11/2004 and 1 submission for -mm
> merge in 2006, right?

Wrong.  I gave a list of dates at the beginning of the month, do you
think I threw dice to get them?

And could you explain, as suspend maintainer for the linux kernel, how
come code submitted for the first time two years ago and with a much
better track record than the in-kernel one is still not in?

  OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Steve Lord <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
  • suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC, PATCH -rt] NMI-safe mb- and atomic-free RT RCU
• Next by Date: Re: Generic battery interface
• Previous by thread: suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
• Next by thread: Re: suspend2 merge history [was Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]