Hi! > > A much more important effect is that non-maintainers aren't familiar > > with coding and patch submission guidelines. For example, in > > suspend2, Nigel first tried with patches that were too monolithic, > > and then his next series was too broken down such that it was too > > hard to review (and "git bisect" wouldn't work). > > All his submissions since 2004 or so? It's a little easy to limit > oneself to the last two ones. Nigel did not do any submissions in 2004 or so. Check your fact, that stuff was marked 'RFC' and yes I did comment on it. He did 1 (one) submission that looked like SubmittingPatches at the first sight, and that was very recent. Stop spreading lies. Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Steve Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Require mmap handler for a.out executables
- Next by Date: Re: [ltp] Re: Generic battery interface
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):
 |