On Sat 2006-07-08 21:11:17, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:41 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > What is worse, these suspend systems will inevitable have
> > different requirements on the rest of the kernel, and will thus
> > complicate the heck out of it for the rest of the developers.
>
> My (user level) understanding is that built in swsusp and Suspend2 use
> the same (or almost the same) machinery in the rest of the kernel to do
> the work. I'm sure Nigel, Pavel and others can confirm or deny this.
It is pretty similar, yes.
> > No fancy shnazy GUI inside the kernel, but SIMPLE.
>
> AFAIK, none of the solutions have GUI inside the kernel.
Then you need to read suspend2 patch again.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
