Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:41 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> What is worse, these suspend systems will inevitable have
> different requirements on the rest of the kernel, and will thus
> complicate the heck out of it for the rest of the developers.

My (user level) understanding is that built in swsusp and Suspend2 use
the same (or almost the same) machinery in the rest of the kernel to do
the work. I'm sure Nigel, Pavel and others can confirm or deny this.

> No fancy shnazy GUI inside the kernel, but SIMPLE.

AFAIK, none of the solutions have GUI inside the kernel.

-- 
Bojan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux