Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 11:11 +0200, Jan Rychter wrote:

> I hate these kinds of discussions, but since no one else did, I'm going
> to say this very openly: I don't think you should be the one "deciding"
> this.

ACK.

Given that:

- this tie is permanent due to fundamental design disagreements

- swsusp, uswsusp and Suspend2 can coexist in the same tree

- Nigel has a track record of excellent support for his code

Why not make another kernel subsystem (Suspend2) and make Nigel
maintainer of it? Then all this nonsense can stop and distributions and
users can pick what they really want.

Andrew? Linus?

-- 
Bojan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux