Chase Venters wrote:
can you name some non-GPL non-proprietary modules we should be concerned about?
You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary". If so, then by definition there are none. Regards, Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: "David Schwartz" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
- RE: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- References:
- [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>
- [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- Prev by Date: Serial-Core: USB-Serial port current issues.
- Next by Date: Re: How does RAID work with IT8212 RAID PCI card?
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- Index(es):
 |