Stephen,
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > @@ -2176,3 +2279,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_wake_async);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(sockfd_lookup);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_sendmsg);
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_recvmsg);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_bind);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_listen);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_accept);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_connect);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_getsockname);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_getpeername);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_getsockopt);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_setsockopt);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_sendpage);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_ioctl);
>
> Don't we want to restrict this to GPL code with EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL?
There are direct derivatives of the BSD/POSIX system call
interface. The protocol function pointers within the socket
structure are not GPL only. Why make this wrappered access to
them GPL only? It will only encourange the reverse of what they
were intended to do: be used instead of the protocol function
pointers within the socket structure, that currently carry no
such restriction.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]