Daniel, On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary". If so, then by > definition there are none. Well, being GPL compatible is not a requirement for an open source license. IANAL, but last I checked, pure-BSD is not compatible with GPL (it actually has to be dual-licensed BSD/GPL). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- References:
- [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Sridhar Samudrala <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Chase Venters <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- From: Daniel Phillips <[email protected]>
- [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Avoid race w/ posix-cpu-timer and exiting tasks
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
- Index(es):
 |