On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 10:36 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Friday 02 June 2006 04:43, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 14:04 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > > - disk I/O bandwidth:
> > > > we started to use CFQv2, but it is quite poor in this regard. First, it
> > > > doesn't prioritizes writes and async disk operations :( And even for
> > > > sync reads we found some problems we work on now...
> >
> > CKRM (on e-series) had an implementation based on a modified CFQ
> > scheduler. Shailabh is currently working on porting that controller to
> > f-series.
>
> I hope that the changes you have to improve CFQ were done in a way that is
> suitable for mainline and you're planning to try and merge them there.
That is our #1 object :)
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [email protected] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
