Alan Cox wrote: > On Gwe, 2006-05-12 at 21:22 +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: > >>Ok, maybe not PMS ? >> >>Can you imagine a bug report from someone that "has problem with PMS"? >>:) > > We've had a driver for the pms card for many years and nobody over the > age of about 18 has afaik found it amusing. Depends, I never heard of the pms card but I do have this tingling feeling that some actually will hear of and/or use port multipliers for SATA meaning that "not many heard of the pms card so not many over the age of 18 found it amusing" but not the same is true for port multipliers. // Stefan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
- From: "Randy.Dunlap" <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
- From: Stefan Smietanowski <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
- Prev by Date: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
- Next by Date: RE: [PATCH for 2.6.17] [3/5] i386/x86_64: Force pci=noacpi on HP XW9300
- Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
- Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
- Index(es):
 |