RE: [PATCH for 2.6.17] [3/5] i386/x86_64: Force pci=noacpi on HP XW9300

>The system has multiple PCI segments and we don't handle that properly
>yet in PCI and ACPI. Short term before this is fixed blacklist it to
>pci=noacpi.

I'm okay with the patch, but it makes me wonder...

Is this the 1st/only system Linux has run on with multiple PCI segments?
What are your expectations for where "short-term" ends and "long-term"
begins?

thanks,
-Len
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH for 2.6.17] [3/5] i386/x86_64: Force pci=noacpi on HP XW9300
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH for 2.6.17] [3/5] i386/x86_64: Force pci=noacpi on HP XW9300
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
• Next by Date: [RFT] major libata update
• Previous by thread: [PATCH for 2.6.17] [3/5] i386/x86_64: Force pci=noacpi on HP XW9300
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.17] [3/5] i386/x86_64: Force pci=noacpi on HP XW9300
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]