Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data

On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 07:43 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 11:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> > I haven't yet tried running with the RT Latency / Trace tools.  I can try 
> > those if folks they think they will be useful.
> 
> FWIW, enabling tracing made the 10ms failure variant fairly repeatable
> here.

Make sure you're not reading /proc/latency_trace during the test - it
will reliably cause missed deadlines.

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Florian Paul Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Darren Hart <[email protected]>
- Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
  - From: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.17-rc4-mm1
Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] libata: new EH, NCQ, hotplug and PM patches against stable kernel
Previous by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Next by thread: Re: rt20 scheduling latency testcase and failure data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]