On Tue, 2 May 2006, Neil Brown wrote:
>
> Maybe the eisa_set_level_irq should be passed 'irq' rather than 'newirq'
> ??
Yeah, stupid cut-and-paste error (the eisa_set_level_irq() call _is_
already there in the PCI irq setting, for the case where we actually have
to set up routing that didn't exist before).
That's also why I'm a bit nervous even about my stupid one-liner patch: if
the irq routing is already set up, and we just use the irq we're told to
use, I'm not sure we should touch ELCR even if it "looks wrong". It
obviously works on your machine, but I wonder what could break on others..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
