Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed

> .
> 
> 5/ Something I haven't thought of.


do a background poll and if that gets a lot of "hits" maybe increase the
frequency of it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- better leve triggered IRQ management needed
  - From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
  - From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
  - From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] don't use flush_tlb_all in suspend time
Next by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.17-rc3] i386: fix broken FP exception handling
Previous by thread: Re: better leve triggered IRQ management needed
Next by thread: Compiling C++ modules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]