Re: assert/crash in __rmqueue() when enabling CONFIG_NUMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 02 May 2006 16:02, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > Oh that's a 32bit kernel. I don't think the 32bit NUMA has ever worked
> > anywhere but some Summit systems (at least every time I tried it it blew up 
> > on me and nobody seems to use it regularly). Maybe it would be finally time to mark it 
> > CONFIG_BROKEN though or just remove it (even by design it doesn't work very well) 
> 
> Bollocks. It works fine, 

On what kind of box? Some summit system, right?

> and is tested every single day, on every git 
> release, and every -mm tree.

Well, it doesn't work for Ingo clearly. My own experiences every time
I tried it were similar.

I think I stand by my original statement.

-Andi

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux