Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)

On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:39 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote:
> > It is slightly slower,
> 
> Sorry, but that is just unacceptable. 

Um... suspend2 puts extra tests into really hot paths like fork(), which
is equally unacceptable to many people.

Why can't people understand that arguing "it works" without any
consideration of possible performance tradeoffs is not a good enough
argument for merging?

Lee

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Sebastian Kügler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
  • Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
    • From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: (pspace,pid) vs true pid virtualization
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: Consolidated and improved smpnice patch
• Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]