Hi. On Monday 20 February 2006 20:02, Lee Revell wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 10:39 +0100, Matthias Hensler wrote: > > > It is slightly slower, > > > > Sorry, but that is just unacceptable. > > Um... suspend2 puts extra tests into really hot paths like fork(), which > is equally unacceptable to many people. It doesn't. Fork is only a 'really hot path' if you have a fork bomb running. The scheduler is a really hot path (which Suspend2 patches don't touch, by the way). The change in the page allocation routine follows a comment saying "This is the last chance, in general, before the goto nopage." It adds one further test to the four already done at that point. Regards, Nigel -- See our web page for Howtos, FAQs, the Wiki and mailing list info. http://www.suspend2.net IRC: #suspend2 on Freenode
Attachment:
pgpw2L6oi7XDC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- From: Nigel Cunningham <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Matthias Hensler <[email protected]>
- Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 04/20] pspace: Allow multiple instaces of the process id namespace
- Next by Date: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Previous by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Next by thread: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.)
- Index(es):
 |