Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On January 21, 2006 11:51:28 PM +0100 Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]> wrote:

And the more the development head proceeds from the "stable" one, the
more work is it to "backport" some hardware driver IMHO. Especially if
"stability" is a primary concern.

Yes, I realise all of this. But everyone seems to get this damned territorial attitude that I want to see kernel development stopped, quite the opposite. All I want to see is a stable target for certain windows of time. So that way when bugs are fixed that are trivial there's a place to go without upgrading scads of userland stuff or worrying about lots of unrelated change.


	Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services







--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux