--On January 21, 2006 11:51:28 PM +0100 Bernd Petrovitsch <[email protected]>
wrote:
And the more the development head proceeds from the "stable" one, the
more work is it to "backport" some hardware driver IMHO. Especially if
"stability" is a primary concern.
Yes, I realise all of this. But everyone seems to get this damned
territorial attitude that I want to see kernel development stopped, quite
the opposite. All I want to see is a stable target for certain windows of
time. So that way when bugs are fixed that are trivial there's a place to
go without upgrading scads of userland stuff or worrying about lots of
unrelated change.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
Embedded Linux Development and Services
--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
