Re: Development tree, PLEASE?

[Michael Loftis <mloftis@wgops.com>]

--On January 21, 2006 11:51:28 PM +0100 Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at> 
wrote:
> And the more the development head proceeds from the "stable" one, the
> more work is it to "backport" some hardware driver IMHO. Especially if
> "stability" is a primary concern.
Yes, I realise all of this.  But everyone seems to get this damned 
territorial attitude that I want to see kernel development stopped, quite 
the opposite.  All I want to see is a stable target for certain windows of 
time.  So that way when bugs are fixed that are trivial there's a place to 
go without upgrading scads of userland stuff or worrying about lots of 
unrelated change.
> 	Bernd
> --
> Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
> mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
>           Embedded Linux Development and Services


--
"Genius might be described as a supreme capacity for getting its possessors
into trouble of all kinds."
-- Samuel Butler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/