On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 01:57 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 07:29:09PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 12:20 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:34:02 -0500,
> > > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:13:47AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > On Iau, 2006-01-19 at 17:51 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > > > > The status is we need someone who has the hardware who can add printk's
> > > > > > to the driver to identify what triggers the hang. It should not be
> > > > > > hard, the OSS driver reportedly works.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=328
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The bug has been in FEEDBACK state for a long time.
> > > > >
> > > > > 99.9% of users don't ever look in ALSA bugzilla.
> > > > >
> > > > > A dig shows
> > > > >
> > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=157371
> > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171221
> > > >
> > > > Lee, if you can point me at a patch with debugging printk's I'm
> > > > happy to throw that into the next Fedora test update for the
> > > > users in the latter bug to test. (The first one seemed to go AWOL)
> > >
> > > The bug for Latitude CSx should have been fixed by the following
> > > commit:
> > >
> > > commit 47530cf44cb5f3945ed04a5ae65d06bf423cd97b
> > > Author: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
> > > Date: Wed Oct 19 16:03:10 2005 +0200
> > >
> > > [ALSA] nm256: reset workaround for Latitude CSx
> > >
> > > This might not conver all Dell models. In such a case, try
> > > reset_workaround2=1. See the section of nm256 in
> > > ALSA-Configuration.txt for details.
> >
> > OK I will update the ALSA bug report with this info. IIRC at least one
> > user already reported that the above commit does not fix the hangs.
>
> The bug reporter reported this in the last comment of the bug (1.0.10rc3
> already included the mentioned fix).
They did not try "reset_workaround". I have updated the bug report with
this advice.
Lee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]