Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach

On Iau, 2006-01-19 at 15:43 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> Even the NeoMagic 256 which is a Pentium II era device and was in
> widespread use we cannot find a tester for.

There are plenty of neomagic audio users around, I've seen bug reports
about neomagic + ALSA hangs that have been filed.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

References:
- RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
  - From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
  - From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 000 of 5] md: Introduction
Next by Date: Re: EDAC config cleanup
Previous by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
Next by thread: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]