RE: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver

Adrian Bunk wrote on Friday, January 20, 2006 5:02 PM
> Why did noone tell me anythong about such issues although I'm the one 
> listed as having this driver deprecated?
> Is our feature removal process completely busted?

Now that you know about it, you should remove yourself from deprecating
the driver and leave it alone.

> And WTF is ISV?

Independent Software Vendor.

- Ken

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
  - From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
Next by Date: Re: set_bit() is broken on i386?
Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]