RE: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver

Adrian Bunk wrote on Friday, January 20, 2006 5:02 PM
> Why did noone tell me anythong about such issues although I'm the one 
> listed as having this driver deprecated?
> Is our feature removal process completely busted?

Now that you know about it, you should remove yourself from deprecating
the driver and leave it alone.

> And WTF is ISV?

Independent Software Vendor.

- Ken

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: RFC: OSS driver removal, a slightly different approach
• Next by Date: Re: set_bit() is broken on i386?
• Previous by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
• Next by thread: Re: [2.6 patch] the scheduled removal of the obsolete raw driver
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]