On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 16:17 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 22:08 +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:07 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > > By your logic it's also broken to use cond_resched() in filesystem code. > > > > ...and your point is? > > Reductio ad absurdum. Subsystems not using cond_resched would render > Linux unusable for even trivial soft realtime applications like AV > playback and recording. It may surprise you to learn that some people don't use their computers for AV playback and recording. However absurd it may seem to you, those people are quite happy to use 2.4.x kernels without a cond_resched lurking in every nook and cranny. Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] - Fix memory ordering problem in wake_futex()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Index(es):