On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 10:39 +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > No! This is not the same thing at all. > > You are asking the coder to provide a policy judgement as to whether > or > not the users might care. > > As far as I'm concerned, other users' MP3 player, X processes, and > keyboard response times can rot in hell whenever I'm busy writing out > data at full blast. I don't give a rats arse about user interactivity, > because my priority is to see the batch jobs complete. > By your logic it's also broken to use cond_resched() in filesystem code. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- References:
- [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Prev by Date: con_set_trans_new breakage in 2.6.15rc6-git3
- Next by Date: Re: [Question] LinuxThreads, setuid - Is there user mode hook?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Index(es):