Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response

[Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>]

Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 13:26 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
>
>
> > > Then have io_schedule() automatically set that flag, and convert NFS to
> > > use io_schedule(), or something along those lines. I don't want a bunch
> > > of RT-specific flags littering the NFS/RPC code.
> >
> > This flag isn't RT-specific.  It's used in the scheduling SCHED_NORMAL 
> > tasks and has no other semantic effects.
>
>
> It still has sod all business being in the NFS code. We don't touch task
> scheduling in the filesystem code.

How do you explain the use of the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE flag then?

Peter
--
Peter Williams                                   pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
 -- Ambrose Bierce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/