On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:07 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > By your logic it's also broken to use cond_resched() in filesystem code. ...and your point is? Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Prev by Date: Re: nfs invalidates lose pte dirty bits
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.15-rc5-rt4: BUG: swapper:0 task might have lost a preemption check!
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix adverse effects of NFS client on interactive response
- Index(es):
 |