On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:00:54PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Even if behavior is unchanged, this doesn't mean that people like their code
> being modified behind their back...
>
> Anyway, last time I tried to bring this up with the union of Mac and PowerMac
> guys, no one seemed to remember why ADBREQ_RAW was really needed...
>From my reading of the code it's a way for mac/misc.c to send a packet that
starts with CUDA_PACKET or PMU_PACKET instead of ADB_PACKET, but otherwise
is the same as normal adb_request() ones...
Used for access to timer, nvram, etc. - looks like that puppy used to
use the same protocol for more than just ADB and the first byte of packet
really selects the destination...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]