Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration

Hi,

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Al Viro wrote:

> So who should I put as the author?  You or Geert (or whatever attributions
> might have been in said big patch)?  Incidentally,  ADBREQ_RAW had leaked
> into mainline (sans definition) in 2.3.45-pre2, which was Feb 13 2000, i.e.
> more than 1.5 year before your commit, so there's quite a chunk of history
> missing...

I'd say Geert, but it probably comes from the Mac tree. Anyway, it 
wouldn't be such a bad idea to ask him first why it's in his postponed 
queue:

http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-2.6.x-merging/POSTPONED/130-adbraw.diff

My guess it needs some ack from the ppc people.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
    • From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
• Next by Date: Re: SATA feature list available
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]