Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration

Hi,

On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Al Viro wrote:

> another compile fix, pulled straight from m68k CVS

Thanks, but if you pull changes out of CVS could you please keep the 
author intact? CVS may be bad, but it's not that bad.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] m68k: compile fix - hardirq checks were in wrong place
• Next by Date: [PATCH/RFC] SPI: async message handing library update
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/3] m68k: compile fix - ADBREQ_RAW missing declaration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]