* David Howells ([email protected]) wrote: > Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I thought that too at first, which is why I flagged it at first. But I > > think it's actually not a real problem, because isn't that !CONFIG_KEYS? > > So, I think it's just cosmetic. > > It is a problem; at least I found it to be one. And no it isn't !CONFIG_KEYS. Ah, right, that's the other ifdef there. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Keys: Possessor permissions should be additive
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Keys: Split key permissions checking into a .c file
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Prev by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Next by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Previous by thread: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Next by thread: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Index(es):
 |