* David Howells ([email protected]) wrote:
> +static inline int security_key_permission(key_ref_t key_ref,
> + struct task_struct *context,
> + key_perm_t perm)
> +{
> + return -1;
> +}
No solid reason on that one, might as well be 0 for consistency.
Other than that, looks good. It's going to conflict with some pending
changes I have, how shall we work that? I can put all of these in that
queue?
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
