Chris Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought that too at first, which is why I flagged it at first. But I > think it's actually not a real problem, because isn't that !CONFIG_KEYS? > So, I think it's just cosmetic. It is a problem; at least I found it to be one. And no it isn't !CONFIG_KEYS. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- References:
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Keys: Possessor permissions should be additive
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Keys: Split key permissions checking into a .c file
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- From: David Howells <[email protected]>
- Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Prev by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Next by Date: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Previous by thread: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Next by thread: Re: [Keyrings] [PATCH] Keys: Add LSM hooks for key management [try #2]
- Index(es):
 |