Kyle wrote:
> it will result in much less
> duplication of effort and much cleaner code.
It is not a foregone conclusion that combining two jobs into
one is less effort - that depends on how well the two jobs
merge.
Your comments remind me a little bit of the reassurance that
one hear's from a CEO justifying big merger.
Sometimes there's enough synergy to pay for the merger, sometimes
not. The devil is in the details.
The devil really is in the details.
Since there is nothing further I have to contribute to these
details, I will return to my regularly scheduled cpuset programming.
Take care.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- From: [email protected] (H. Peter Anvin)
- Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.13-mm3
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.13-mm3
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- Index(es):
