Re: 2.6.13-mm3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/12/05, Nish Aravamudan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/12/05, Paolo Ciarrocchi <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 9/12/05, Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > - There are several performance tuning patches here which need careful
> > >  attention and testing.  (Does anyone do performance testing any more?)
> >
> > How about the tool announced months ago by Martin J. Bligh ?
> >
> > http://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mbligh/abat/regression_matrix.html
> 
> Preferred location is: test.kernel.org (much shorter too!)

I wasn't aware of that, thank you! Now I won't forget anymore that URL ;-)
 
> Also, the problem for -mm3 is that -mm2 did not build on most
> machines. -mm1 did on 4/6. Probably some determination could be made
> from those.

I see. But I still think that automated testing is a great opportunity
for the community to pinpoint problems.

Is there anything we can do to make thinks work better ?

-- 
paoloc.blogspot.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]
  Powered by Linux