hpa wrote:
> The only sane thing is to have a set of ABI headers with a clean,
> specific set of rules, which is included by the kernel private headers,
> as well as userspace.
Why must the ABI headers be included by both kernel and user headers to
be sane?
Hmmm ... I'm not sure I want to ask that, actually. I have this feeling
from the tone of your assertion that you can explain to me why such a
header organization is the only one that fits your mental model of how
these things are structured, but that communication between us may
break down when you try to convince me that your mental model for this
is the only correct one.
Oh well ... we'll see where this goes.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- References:
- [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- From: [email protected] (H. Peter Anvin)
- Re: [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Kyle Moffett <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- [RFC] Splitting out kernel<=>userspace ABI headers
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13 14/14] sas-class: SCSI Host glue
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.13 5/14] sas-class: sas_discover.c Discover process (end devices)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][MEGAPATCH] Change __ASSEMBLY__ to __ASSEMBLER__ (defined by GCC from 2.95 to current CVS)
- Index(es):
