Robert Love <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 15:33 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Since such a check is possible, that's definitely a merge-stopper IMO > > First, I am not asking that Linus merge this. Everyone needs to relax. > > Second, we don't know a DMI-based solution will work. I'll check it out. With some luck it might be in the ACPI name space with a known name. If yes that would be far more reliable than DMI. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] New SBC8360 watchdog driver
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver, with probing.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Index(es):
