On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 20:01 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Not that we've been able to tell. It is a legacy platform device. > > > > So, unfortunately, no probe() routine. > > dmi surely.... Patches accepted. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- References:
- [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Robert Love <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Prev by Date: Problem with cpufreq on Geode GX1
- Next by Date: Re: process creation time increases linearly with shmem
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] IBM HDAPS accelerometer driver.
- Index(es):
